<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Get Colormanaged &#187; Grayscale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/category/grayscale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getcolormanaged.com</link>
	<description>Blog about Colormanagement and Image Editing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Black and White</title>
		<link>http://www.getcolormanaged.com/general/grayscale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.getcolormanaged.com/general/grayscale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>René</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grayscale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhotoshopCS4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getcolormanaged.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do humans see?
The human eye is most sensitive for yellow-green light. Take a look at the next gradient for instance:

To me, indeed the green-to-yellow part looks brightest. Not so to Photoshop however.
About a hundred ways to loose the color
Well, maybe not thàt much, but quite a few anyhow. The easiest way (but offering zero [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>What do humans see?</h3>
<p><a href="http://photo.net/photo/edscott/vis00010.htm" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/photo.net/photo/edscott/vis00010.htm?referer=');">The human eye is most sensitive for yellow-green light</a>. Take a look at the next gradient for instance:<br />
<a title="Color gradient image" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/gradient.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/gradient.jpg" alt="Color gradient image" /></a></p>
<p>To me, indeed the green-to-yellow part looks brightest. <em>Not so</em> to Photoshop however.</p>
<h3>About a hundred ways to loose the color</h3>
<p>Well, maybe not thàt much, but quite a few anyhow. The easiest way (but offering zero control) would be to go through Image &gt; Mode &gt; Grayscale. That&#8217;ll give you this:<br />
<a title="Gradient image converted to grayscale" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/grayscale.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/grayscale.jpg" alt="Gradient image converted to grayscale" /></a></p>
<p>Your image just became 1/3 of the original size, and that weight loss is caused because there&#8217;s now only a &#8216;gray&#8217; channel instead of a red, green and blue one.<br />
Big drawback of this method, is that it&#8217;s <em>destructive</em>: You indeed <em>loose</em> the color: It&#8217;s gone for good. Since you also have zero control, I&#8217;d never use this method.</p>
<h3>Layers</h3>
<p>So, we want something that&#8217;s reversible. Lots of ways to do that, using (adjustment) layers, but not all of them good&#8230; Let&#8217;s start off by naming just about the worst way imaginable: Desaturate. What this does, is that it removes all color information from an image, without the option for any user intervention. While that may or may not be important to you, this <em>should</em> be: All colors are treated as if they were equal.<br />
While equality is a great thing, in this case, it <em>isn&#8217;t</em>, since to us different colors aren&#8217;t equal. <span id="more-192"></span></p>
<h3>What does Photoshop see?</h3>
<p>Simply put: Numbers. If you&#8217;d open the above color gradient in Photoshop, the eye dropper will show you what it&#8217;s made of: A simple gradient in each channel. The image below shows the channels:</p>
<p><a title="Individual color channels and HSB values of gradient image" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/gradientchannels.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/gradientchannels.jpg" alt="Individual color channels and HSB values of gradient image" /></a></p>
<p>To understand what Photoshop sees a bit better, have a look at the info palette, and in particular the HSB values there. The <em>only thing</em> changing there is the hue angle! Saturation and Brightness <em>remain at 100 percent</em> in the entire gradient.</p>
<p>Not vastly surprising then, that this is what you get when you do a &#8217;straightforward&#8217; desaturate:<br />
<a title="Gradient image desaturated" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/desaturate.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/desaturate.jpg" alt="Gradient image desaturated" /></a></p>
<p>Hue and Saturation are at 0, Brightness is at 50 percent. This might be correct &#8220;by the numbers&#8221;, but it&#8217;s not what I&#8217;d want for making a nice black and white image&#8230;</p>
<h3>A better way</h3>
<p>As with most things in Photoshop, there&#8217;s plenty of ways to convert a color image to a grayscale. I&#8217;m going to show a few here that do a better job then desaturate, and offer more control then &#8216;Image &gt; Mode &gt; Grayscale&#8217;.</p>
<p>One simple way would be to use <em>blend modes</em>: Duplicate the background layer, desaturate the duplicate layer and set the blend mode of the top layer to <em>color</em>.<br />
This can all be done using keyboard shortcuts: Cmd+J, Shift+Cmd+U, Shift+Opt+C, so is very quick.<br />
<em><strong>Disadvantage</strong></em> of that method is that it <em>doubles the file size</em>.</p>
<p>Photoshop is acting more then <em>a bit</em> goofy here by the way: If you desaturate the top layer, you essentially fill it with medium gray. <em>However</em>, if you create a new layer and fill that with medium gray (or black or white or whatever shade of gray in between) by using the fill command, the file size <em>does <strong>not</strong></em> double. Very weird indeed.</p>
<p>So the <em>fastest</em> way to go black and white <em>without</em> doubling the file size would be this: Shift+Cmd+Opt+N, Cmd+Backspace, Shift+Opt+C.<br />
<a title="Gradient image Hue/Sat adjustment layer set to 'Color'" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/gradient_HSadj_Color.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 40px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/gradient_HSadj_Color.jpg" alt="Gradient image Hue/Sat adjustment layer set to 'Color'" /></a></p>
<h3>Control</h3>
<p>All nice and fast, but this doesn&#8217;t give you much <em>control</em>. So let&#8217;s try a different method. Make a Hue / Saturation adjustment layer. Set saturation to 0. Now you have the uniform gray image of the example above. Now, set the blending mode to &#8216;Color&#8217; (Or Hue, or Saturation. Doesn&#8217;t matter in this case.) Same as when you use that blend mode on a layer filled with pixels! Yet still no control.<br />
To get control, add <em>another</em> hue saturation adjustment layer between this one and the background image. Set the blend mode to &#8216;Luminosity&#8217;. Do <em>not</em> touch the Saturation slider here however. Instead, use the <em>&#8216;Hue&#8217;</em> slider to alter the grayscale image.<br />
The example below shows the effect of a shift in hue of +40:<br />
<a title="Gradient image Hue/Sat adjustment layer set to 'Color'" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/dualHSadj.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 40px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/dualHSadj.jpg" alt="Gradient image Hue/Sat adjustment layer set to 'Color'" /></a></p>
<h3>Alternatives</h3>
<p>As said, in Photoshop there are more ways to do this.<br />
You could for instance just copy the contents of one channel into the image. What works better then that, is to use either the &#8216;Calculations&#8217; command or, more flexible and a bit easier to understand, a <em>Channel Mixer</em> adjustment layer.<br />
Tick the grayscale box there, and PS will default to these values:<br />
<a title="Channel mixer default values and altered settings" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/channelmixbox.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/channelmixbox.jpg" alt="Channel mixer default values and altered settings" /></a><br />
You can then drag any slider to wherever you want, creating the type of black and white image you want. For instance for a portrait, using more red will result in lighter skin tones, using more green will give more contrast&#8230; As can be seen in the screenshot, Channel Mixer will warn you when the total of channels goes over 100 percent. However that <em>does not</em> mean that you must never go higher. Depends on the image really&#8230; The Histogram is your friend here.</p>
<p>The two gradients made with channel mixer: First default setting, then the altered setting:<br />
<a title="Gradient after channel mixer default values" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/channelmix.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/channelmix.jpg" alt="Gradient after channel mixer default values" /></a><br />
<a title="Gradient after channel mixer altered settings" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/channelmix.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/channelmix2.jpg" alt="Gradient after channel mixer altered settings" /></a></p>
<p>Channel mixer has the strangeness that if you untick the &#8216;Monochrome&#8217; box, the values for all channels stay at what you set (83, 24 and 5 percent in the above example). If however you then tick the &#8216;Monochrome&#8217; box again, you&#8217;re <em>back at the default values</em>! Not the brightest decision Adobe ever made I think.</p>
<h3>New to CS3</h3>
<p>In PSCS3, Adobe introduced the &#8216;Black and White&#8217; adjustment layer. It&#8217;s quite a bit like a Channel mixer, but is adjustable for 6 colors, instead of 3 channels. So it offers more control (and more options for the user to screw up).<br />
<a title="Black and White adjustment layer with default values and altered settings" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/blackandwhitebox.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/blackandwhitebox.jpg" alt="Black and White adjustment layer with default values and altered settings" /></a><br />
Apparently, someone at Adobe must have been watching <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Is_Spinal_Tap" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Is_Spinal_Tap?referer=');">Spinal Tap</a>, since the sliders of this adjustment layer range from -200 to +300. &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven?referer=');">Goes to eleven</a>&#8216; indeed. For the adventurous: There&#8217;s also an &#8216;Auto&#8217; button.<br />
<a title="Gradient after Black and white adjustment layer with default settings" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/blackandwhite.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/blackandwhite.jpg" alt="Gradient after Black and white adjustment layer with default settings" /></a><br />
<a title="Gradient after Black and white adjustment layer with altered settings" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/blackandwhite2.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 40px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/blackandwhite2.jpg" alt="Gradient after Black and white adjustment layer with altered settings" /></a></p>
<h3>New to CS4</h3>
<p>In PSCS4, Adobe included the new &#8216;Vibrance&#8217; adjustment that was first introduced in Lightroom and ACR. That adjustment also features a &#8216;Saturation&#8217; slider.<br />
If you use that slider to desaturate an image, it quickly becomes clear that this is working different then the &#8216;Hue Saturation&#8217; adjustment. You could say it&#8217;s actually <em>working nice</em>.</p>
<p>This is whet you get if you drag the Saturation to -100: A contrasty version of what you get using &#8216;Channel mixer&#8217;.<br />
<a title="Gradient after desaturating in the 'Vibrance' adjustment" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/vibrance.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt; float: left;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/vibrance.jpg" alt="Gradient after desaturating in the 'Vibrance' adjustment" /></a></p>
<h3>Some tips</h3>
<p>If you set <em>any of these adjustment layers</em> to blend mode &#8216;Color&#8217;, you get the exact same result as in the above example with a gray pixel layer set to blend mode &#8216;Color&#8217;: A standard B&amp;W conversion.<br />
This can be useful as a quick way to compare your conversion to a &#8217;standard&#8217; grayscale conversion to see if your version is actually better&#8230;<br />
Blend mode &#8216;Color&#8217; will also work for a &#8216;Solid Color&#8217;, &#8216;Gradient&#8217;, &#8216;Gradient Map&#8217; or &#8216;Pattern&#8217; adjustment layer.  While I cannot think of a use for &#8216;Pattern&#8217;, the first two work similar to a gray pixel layer set to &#8216;Color&#8217;, while the third offers interesting possibilities. Maybe not what you&#8217;d want for your average, day to day grayscale conversion, but nice to experiment a bit.</p>
<p>I leave you with an example of that: A &#8216;Gradient Map&#8217; adjustment layer, using the preset &#8216;Copper&#8217;, then set blend mode to &#8216;Color&#8217;, on an actual photo:<br />
<a title="'Gradient map' adjustment layer, preset 'Copper', set to blend mode 'color'" href="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/gradientmap_copper.jpg" rel='lytebox[grayscale]'><img style="margin: 10px 10px 10px 0pt;" src="http://www.getcolormanaged.com/images/Blog/grayscale/tmb/gradientmap_copper.jpg" alt="'Gradient map' adjustment layer, preset 'Copper', set to blend mode 'color'" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.getcolormanaged.com/general/grayscale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
