Comments on: Firefox 3.5.1 http://www.getcolormanaged.com/color-management/ff351/ Blog about Colormanagement and Image Editing Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:23:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: René http://www.getcolormanaged.com/color-management/ff351/comment-page-1/#comment-343 René Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:34:32 +0000 http://www.getcolormanaged.com/?p=114#comment-343 FF 3.5 does <b>not</b> support V.4 profiles. No idea on the 3.6 beta. Frankly, I've almost stopped using FF 3.5 because of this. FF 3.5 does not support V.4 profiles.
No idea on the 3.6 beta. Frankly, I’ve almost stopped using FF 3.5 because of this.

]]> By: Sebastien http://www.getcolormanaged.com/color-management/ff351/comment-page-1/#comment-314 Sebastien Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:21:03 +0000 http://www.getcolormanaged.com/?p=114#comment-314 That's what I suspect too... I'm using a Dell C22W (Crystal) Wide Gamut. I can't find any profile for this monitor, but I calibrated it using Huey Pro, and the resulting profile seems to be v4. I had no success with either FF 3.0.15 or 3.5.2 or 3.6beta (3.5.2 only supports v2 though). I opened a RAW (DNG) photo in Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop CS4, then created two JPEG, one with a sRGB embedded profile, another in Adobe RGB. All 3 of them look pretty much identical when displayed in Lightroom / Photoshop, i.e. color managed correctly. Good. Both sRGB and Adobe RGB JPEG files look oversaturated in FireFox or Safari. Ouch. If I disable color management, only the sRGB is oversaturated, the Adobe RGB looks fine, which is expected since it is sent unmanaged to my wide-gamut monitor. My feeling is that even though FF claims to support v4 profiles, it might not be supported correctly. If Lightroom or Photoshop can do it, then there is a way to do it, right? I think maybe it has to do with LUT based profiles, but I don't think Huey Pro has the flexibility to create different kind of profiles... That’s what I suspect too…

I’m using a Dell C22W (Crystal) Wide Gamut. I can’t find any profile for this monitor, but I calibrated it using Huey Pro, and the resulting profile seems to be v4. I had no success with either FF 3.0.15 or 3.5.2 or 3.6beta (3.5.2 only supports v2 though). I opened a RAW (DNG) photo in Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop CS4, then created two JPEG, one with a sRGB embedded profile, another in Adobe RGB. All 3 of them look pretty much identical when displayed in Lightroom / Photoshop, i.e. color managed correctly. Good. Both sRGB and Adobe RGB JPEG files look oversaturated in FireFox or Safari. Ouch. If I disable color management, only the sRGB is oversaturated, the Adobe RGB looks fine, which is expected since it is sent unmanaged to my wide-gamut monitor.

My feeling is that even though FF claims to support v4 profiles, it might not be supported correctly. If Lightroom or Photoshop can do it, then there is a way to do it, right? I think maybe it has to do with LUT based profiles, but I don’t think Huey Pro has the flexibility to create different kind of profiles…

]]>